The production line for coding agents. Many agents, one pull request, only checked work.
One agent is a tool. Ten agents are a production problem. Writing code got cheap; the hard part is who works on what, and trusting what comes back, across a dozen chat threads and half-finished branches.
Agents in parallel fail in ordinary ways. Two of them pick up the same work. A result lands that nothing checked. Reviewers drown in output they cannot verify, and what you actually meant gets thinner with every handoff.
10xs exists to close that gap.
Rules move the work; a model only drafts the plan — not a coding agent, and not autopilot.
Everything that moves a task, checks it or finishes it is a fixed rule. The only model on 10xs servers drafts your plan. Coding runs on your own Claude Code or Codex, on your machine, under your own account. You still decide what gets built and whether a checked task counts as done on its own or waits for you.
Four things have to hold true for that handoff to work.
This is the whole methodology of the production line for coding agents. Not stages you pass through once — four things that stay true for as long as work is moving.
How it works
Describe the project. 10xs drafts the facts and plan and breaks it into tasks with acceptance criteria; you edit and approve. This is the only place 10xs runs a model on its servers. A task can be claimed only once, and a blocked task can't be claimed.
Why it matters
For as many agents as you choose to run, that's the difference between a production line and everyone editing the same thing.
How it works
You bring your own Claude Code or Codex, the official tools, under your own account, as many at once as you choose to run. Each one works a task on your machine, on its own branch.
Why it matters
Your agents are already fast. The bottleneck moved to who is checking all of it. This is where that comes back under control.
How it works
Follow every task while it moves. A task runs as long as it needs; if a machine goes silent for 30 minutes, another machine can pick it up. Each task lands on the sprint branch as one commit, and the sprint's pull request is your review unit.
Why it matters
Throughput stops being capped by how many threads one person can hold in their head.
How it works
Nothing is done until it's checked. The runtime runs the task's tests and refuses handover on a failing exit code; the gate then decides done from a fixed rule table, with no model. Each decision leaves a receipt that names its grade: re-run by your CI, tests passed on your machine, or evidence only.
Why it matters
Rules you can read, not a model's opinion. You decide whether a checked task counts as done on its own or waits for you.
The decisions stay yours. The pull request stays yours to review.
Start free doesn't hand you a document. It walks you through setting up your board — describing the project, shaping it into structure, breaking it into tasks your Claude Code or Codex agents can actually pick up.
That setup isn't the product. It's how the board gets populated. The four pillars are what happens after: as many agents as you choose each work their own task, in parallel, and nothing is done until it's checked.
The methodology is opinionated. It does not support:
Speed is assumed. Seeing it, running agents in parallel, and checking what comes back — that's enforced.
Two audiences:
It's not built for:
Start free: one project, no card. Nothing is done until it's checked.
Questions? We're here. Contact us